jonEbird

November 22, 2008

andLinux

Filed under: linux,usability — jonEbird @ 10:02 am

For years I thought the best way to enhance my Windows experience, with the common Unix/Linux tools I’m most comfortable with, was to do so with cygwin. That was until now. At work, where we are forced to use Windows, I recently had my laptop rebuild and afterwards my re-install of cygwin wasn’t going too well. Finally fed up, I then recalled seeing reviews about colinux and how it was advertised as being tightly integrated into the Windows experience. Before looking for the install media, I then saw that there are a couple of distros which are then built on top of colinux. One of which, andLinux, is a full Ubuntu release and I presumed that their layering on top of colinux was naturally providing additional support and/or features and decided to go with andLinux for the install.

After completing the install, I must say, I am very pleased and impressed with the work they have done. I’m not sure how much of the credit goes to colinux and how much goes to andLinux, but they both get a A+ in my book. Here are my top reasons for choosing andLinux over cygwin:

  1. Full Linux operating system running on top of Windows.
    Not actually being virtualized and is therefore quick. It is a special patch to the Linux kernel which allows this tight integration with winblows.
  2. Each window / app launched takes the same look&feel decorations as each other windows app.
    Translation: Doesn’t look like crap.
    Also, each app’s icon is properly displayed in the task bar instead of the same, repeated icon used in cygwin.
  3. Transition from wired to wireless is seamless.
    This was a piece a co-worker asked me to test out and I’m writing this up while on my wireless network at home. After suspending my laptop at work, I then un-suspended it at home and I didn’t have to touch a thing. My existing terminal window could still query hosts and I even tested an install of a quick package.
  4. It’s running Ubuntu.
    Means to get additional apps, which you might be missing, you get to do "apt-get install <missingapp>" instead of re-launching setup.exe.
  5. Clean terminal.
    What is this bullet point doing here you ask? Well, it is what motivated me to move away from cygwin in the first place today. I was previously trying to use mrxvt and after multiple issues, decided to punt.
    The default terminal appears to be gnome-terminal and yet I choose the XFCE version over the KDE version.
  6. Xming X11 Server included.
    No need for hummingbird’s crappy X server. This is discrete and works very well.
  7. Automatic TAP (bridged) networking configured.
    There is about 4 screens used during the install and none were about networking. Just works.
  8. “cofs” filesystem
    My C:\ drive is mounted at /mnt/win via their ‘cofs’ filesystem. Sweet.

If you are like me and are stuck using Windows for whatever reason, I would highly suggest checking out andLinux. They are currently in beta but I’m okay with dealing with any minor hiccups. I have used it for only two days and already feel light-years away from my previous cygwin days.

November 16, 2008

Pyworks In Summation

Filed under: blogging,PHP,python — jonEbird @ 7:10 pm

I sit in the Atlanta Airport reminiscing over the events of PyWorks ’08. This was the first year for PyWorks but MTA combined the conference with PHP Architect and I believe everyone was happy with the combination. At a minimum, people had engaging conversations between the groups and a significant number of them cross-attended the sessions. I attended two PHP sessions and one neutral session and then the rest Python. Some people were a bit disappointed in the lack of Python attendees and it is true that we didn’t make up a large part of the total 148 attendees of the conference. But with the quality of talks staying superbly high, not having a full room wasn’t a bad thing.

The quality of talks were all superb, indeed. Probably over half of the presenters are either principle developers on high profile projects or they have written a book or own their own consulting company. On day zero, where there were 3hr long tutorial sessions, I spend the morning in Mark Ramm‘s TurboGears but then I switched over to the PHP side in the afternoon to catch Scott MacVicar and Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson‘s Caching for Cash.

At the start of day one, the first day of the normal sessions, I think everyone was expecting a lot more people. There were, in fact, more people but not as many as I was expecting, but again that’s perfectly okay. This day was a full one, starting off with the keynote by Kevin Dangoor about Growing your Community. After a break I then attended Decorators are Fun by Matt Wilson and learned that he is not that far away from me in Cleveland. Next I attended another Mark Ramm talk about WSGI where he was explaining how easy it was to build a web framework. It was given a bit “tongue in check” since he is the primary maintainer of TurboGears. Following that, I attended a middle track session about Distributed version control with GIT by Travis Swicegood. Travis had just finished writing a book about using GIT called Pragmatic Version Control Using Git and not surprisingly gave a authoritation explanation of using GIT. Following lunch, I attending another PHP track presentation but it could have been in the neutral middle track. The talk was Map, Filter, Reduce In the Small and in the Cloud by Sebastian Bergmann where he explained the popular functional programming techniques popularized by Google for computing large quantities of data. Sebastian gave me another reason to checkout Hadoop and in fact I’m now thinking of another Python Magazine article about using hadoop with Jython. For the last session of the day I decided to attend Michael Foord‘s talk about IronPython. I didn’t think I’d ever checkout IronPython on my own, so I thought I’d get a crash course from Michael who also just finished work on his book IronPython in Action.

Still not done with day one. After all of the normal presentation’s concluded, we had happy hour while gearing up for the Pecha Kucha competition sessions. Pecha Kucha is where you provide 20 slides and set them to auto switch every 20 seconds making your session a little over six minutes. Apparently people have found that you can get the same quality bits of information in that format as compared to a full hour session. At least that is what the Japanese have concluded. As for PHP/PyWorks, we mostly had fun with the sessions. There were talks about web security, general ranting, LOLCode, and many others which I’m having a problem remembering. At the end, the LOLCode talk took the prize of the Xbox 360 gaming system by our judges and if you’d really like to see what was going on, you may be able to watch streamed video captured by Travis Swicegood‘s iPhone. Before I went to bed, I rehearsed my presentation one more time.

By the time day two started, it felt like I had been there a full week and yet we still had a full day of presentations again. I started the morning in Chris Perkins‘s talk about the Sphinx Documentation System. We all understand the importance of documentation and it’s not always fun, but again I thought investing 45min catching up on some of the Python “best practices” for documentation would be well worth the time. Afterwards, I stayed in the same room for Jacob Taylor‘s talk about Exploring Artificial Intelligence with Python. Jacob didn’t get around to showing any Python code but he had good attendance for being a founder of SugarCRM. Next, the highlight of the conference, my presentation about LDAP and Python. The number of attendees for my presentation were average for the Python sessions and by this point I felt like I knew everyone which removed any pressure or nervousness. We’ll see how interested people were by seeing who downloads my configparser.py and/or ldapconfig.py scripts. After lunch, I attended Kevin Dangoor‘s Paver talk where he explained the motivations for Paver and showed numerous examples of what pain points it solves. Finally, the last session I attended at PyWorks was Jonathan LaCour‘s talk about Elixir, the Python module which makes introduction into SQLAlchemy an easy one. Elixir helps kick start your DB code by simplifying SQLAlchemy by making a lot of sane choices for you as well as providing other conveniences. Jonathan had to work hard to get all of his content into his hour, mostly because he gave a decent overview of SQLAlchemy and then his Elixir module.

As with the previous day, this day concluded with another happy hour while waiting for our closing keynote. The closing keynote was given by Jay Pipes about “living in the gray areas” and not sticking to extreme black and white of our technologies. He praised the joint efforts being made by the PHP and Python folks and criticized people who are too biased to learn from the other communities. Jay is working on Drizzle, while working for Sun, where they are challanging all of the preconceived notions being made by the MySQL community. Drizzle is basically a fork of MySQL and their goals are to provide a much more streamlined version of a database. Jay explained that forks are good (as well as “sporks”) because it keeps people on their toes and keeps the level of competition up. Finally, Jay’s last point was that we need to spend more time listening to other people and less time preaching our biased opinions.

I overheard PHP and Python people resonating Jay’s message after the keynote. I’m glad to have participated in such a successful conference where I truely believe boundries were crossed. With as much time that I spend with the PHP folks, I was repeatedly asked, “So, you coming over to the PHP side?” I think the last time I was asked that was in the hotel pool where again I was playing the role of the “token Python guy” amongst the PHP folks. To be honest, those PHP folks know how to have fun, and if my criteria for choosing a programming language was the amount of fun the community had I would be doing PHP development. I definately want attend next year’s PyWorks and PHP conference and I have an entire year to come up with my presentation proposals.

November 6, 2008

2D Barcodes

Filed under: blogging,usability — jonEbird @ 12:06 am

In anticipation of heading down to PyWorks 2008, I have been thinking about creating a business card for the sake of keeping in contact with people I meet. One of my main goals, while attending and speaking at PyWorks, is to network with people and mark 2008 as the year which I start participating and contributing within the OSS community. While exercising my creativity in designing a nice business card, I have also been reading about Google’s android mobile platform, and I came across a interesting intersection between the two when I saw a demonstration video.

A Google developer, working on the zxing project (pronounced “zebra crossing”), has printed a 2D barcode encoding of his personal information on the back of his business card. With the builtin camera, on his android phone, he can scan in a barcode and immediate use the encoded data. It is an impressive demonstration of integrating technology with our mobile devices. Check out the video which has inspired me to not only do the same but also write this small informational note about 2D barcodes.

If you didn’t catch it, the format of the 2D barcode on his business card is QR Code. Among the other 2D barcode formats, QR Code barcodes are most popular in Japan where it was invented by Denso-Wave. The popularity of QR Codes in Japan has grown to the level of being supported by nearly every mobile device there and that also means finding QR Codes available on a increasing amount of printed media from fliers to magazines and coupons.

There are other competing 2D barcode formats that I could choose from but after doing researching and not seeing any distinctive advantages, I have concluded to follow suit with the google developer and hope that the android phone’s application and popularity will help propel QR Code’s popularity over the other 2D barcode formats.

Since 2D barcodes are nothing more than encoding and decoding data, the first thing to decide is what data we would like to encode. Since I actually do not have a business of my own and furthermore use a work issued phone, the data I encode will probably be a URL of my website. There are other interesting encodings, though, which include email address, sms, geographic locations, etc. See zxing’s wiki about BarcodeContents for a better discussion for suggested format, including their primary suggestion of using the MECARD format which is typically a composite of Name, Address, Phone number and Email address.

Once you know what you would like to encode in your 2D barcode, I’m guessing you will need software to help with that. With the assumption that you are not going to be encoding/decoding barcodes with a large frequency, my suggestion is that you use online utilities to help you. Interestingly, it turns out that the google chart api can now generate QR Code online. That is both convenient for repeated generation of QR Code but also in dynamic generation of barcodes. But alas, Jason Delport has created a google app engine application to record your text and generate the QR Code for you by generating the google chart api link for you. At that point, you can either use the supplied URL or simply download the png image. Finally, for performing online decoding of the barcode I have found the zxing online decoder to be the best and least intrusive one available.

The main reason 2D barcodes have not really taken off here in the States is because people have not yet came up with a really good idea to propel it into the mainstream. That, my friends, is going to be up to you and me to accomplish. Or, wait, we could just let google usher it in for us? But seriously I think support for mobile devices to read 2D barcodes is great step forward. Afterwards, I can envision graphic designers coming up with clever barcode prints and ways of intriguing people to scan the code for more details, but then it would be people like us who come up with new categories of data to be encoded in the barcodes for new, innovative ways to use them.

To learn more, try the collection of interesting links provided again by the zxing folks.

November 4, 2008

Management Tools for Multi-Vendors

Filed under: adminstration,blogging — jonEbird @ 4:44 pm

The challenge to build a tool which manages multiple vendors and platforms by way of piggy backing off their technology is a losing battle. Be it provisioning, patching, monitoring, etc it doesn’t matter. To choose such a tool, you end up paying big bucks for other people to constantly watch and react to what various vendors are doing. Combine that piece of realization with the fact that a tool will almost never perfectly suit the unique requirements of your business and you’d be in denial to not realize that it sucks. Beyond the shear money of the endeavour you are also wasting time of your associates which will probably not get recouped.

I will never say anything is impossible. You can build such a tool and it can have the necessary hooks to allow your associates to customize it to suits your needs. My point is, that work is much harder to pull off than the naive observer might realize. Imagine you are abstracting the details of Suse’s automated installer “AutoYast”. But let’s say the OpenSuse project decides to take a drastic change on how the unattended installer works. Their efforts, no doubt, will be motivated by improving their end user’s experience by presumably making it quicker, simpler and overall a better product. Depending on how drastic the change, it could represent an entirely different philosophical approach to OS installs. As the tool builder, trying to provide a layer of abstraction, you have just stuck yourself into a large endeavour to re-factor those pieces of your application to handle the radical changes being made. It’s a given risk, if that is what you’re providing. My point is, as a customer, just don’t buy that product.

To purchase such a product, you are basically stating that you believe the particular team of developers are going to continue to accurately and intuitively abstract those details for you. Don’t forget you’re still paying a lot of money for this. But this is how management thinks, “I’m going to buy this tool and allow my associates to use one tool and spend their time elsewhere.” It doesn’t happen. Instead, the associates try to shift their energies on learning a new tool, figuring out how to customize it for their needs and probably end up with one FTE dedicated to maintaining it.

Please, don’t waste your time and money. Spend your time collaborating with teammates. Decide upon OS and install standards. Each OS installer provides the ability to perform basic configuration of disk, network, software, etc and then allows for final post-install hook. That hook will then lean upon your team’s efforts. You will end up spending the same amount of work creating your post-install scripts as it takes to merely install and train folks on an “all in one” tool. Big difference of “rolling your own” is you now own the tool set, it already exactly meets your needs, every one knows and understands how it works, updates are easy, knowledge and skill gained is more widely recognized and all the while you haven’t spent more money.

Now for the counter-point: You have to have a good team to pull this off. Team members will require enough experience to demonstrate the proper discernment in building out a quality framework. So what if you maintain a Solaris Jumpstart, RedHat kickstart, Suse autoyast, etc all together? Keep your data and configs centrally managed together. Parallel concepts between each one, maintain like directory hierarchies, write straight forward documentation on using and performing builds. Doesn’t it make sense to be proficient in the OS tool which comes directly from the vendor, at least from a personal development perspective?